Complex coronary cases
Staged PCI of Unprotected LM/LAD/LCx – Sept 2012
Views 14452

Case: 75-year old male with new onset CCS angina Class II, and uncontrolled hyptertension had high risk stress MPI for multi-vessel ischemia. Patient underwent cath on September 11, 2012 revealing 3V + LM CAD (Syntax Score 34), and normal LV function. Patient had Heart Team consultation and CABG was recommended but strongly refused by the patient. Patient underwent successful PCI of prox and mid RCA using two Everolimus Eluting Cobalt Chromium DES. Patient is now staged for PCI of unprotected LM/LAD/ LCX.

1:14:19

Q&A
Q
When your Heart Team speaks to a patient, do both the cardiologist and the surgeon simultaneously speak to the patient?
A.

Yes both Interventionalist and CT surgeon along with the referring cardiologist present various options to the patient, along with the one best recommended choice.


Q
What steps do you take to prevent wire entrapment?
A.

As long guidewire is distal in the main side branch (radio-opaque portion beyond the sidebranch ostium) and not curled up and not stuck in a very small distal branch, it is always easy to pull it back from, behind the stent.


Q
Any role for FFR in this procedure?
A.

FFR can be used routinely but we do not use if lesion is >90% obstruction; like in this case and hence FFR was not used. FAME trial data showed that there is a linear correlation of angiographic stenosis and FFR of <0.8; 90%+ stenosed lesions have FFR of <0.8 in 96% of cases.


Q
What about IVUS, in particular, to size the LMCA and confirm adequate stent apposition?
A.

Yes IVUS has shown to improve overall outcomes of DES in LM lesions and should be done routinely. Usually IVUS leads to better stent optimization by using a larger balloon at high pressure.


Q
What do you expect as a TLR for this procedure?
A.

<5% with use of EES DES; as was used in this case.


Q
What will contribute to changing interventional cardiology practices - you spoke about this briefly. Please expand. "More than FAME or COURAGE, it may be AUC"
A.

Clearly we first need to make sure that a particular case is appropriate for revascularization, before getting to the issue of lesion significance, that is where IVUS and FFR will help. Hence AUC gets the center stage in our decision for PCI.


Q
If this patient is brought back for a repeat procedure, does your institution also face barriers and hurdles through insurance companies?
A.

Staged procedure sometimes can create controversy and denials, if reason for staging is not well documented at the time of initial PCI. Hence if staged PCI is scheduled, we document the reason(s) for staging in the initial cathreport.


Q
For this particular patient with incomplete revascularization, what kind of clinical follow up will you have?
A.

This patient will be brought back in 3 months to evaluate LM patency and at that time re-attempt LCx PCI, if pt still has residual class II+ symptoms.


Q
In the absence of GI bleeding, does this patient qualify for GP2b/3a?
A.

Yes particularly we have left dissection in OM1 branch; as GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors have shown to decrease sidebranch closure and acute closure after PTCA and after residual dissections (EPIC, EPILOG and EPISTENT trials).


Q
What is your long-term anti-platelet management for this patient?
A.

This pt will be on clopidogrel 75mg po daily lifelong and perhaps aspirin 81mg daily for at least 30-days (as long as no recurrent GI bleeding).


comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive marketing emails from: Mount Sinai Hospital, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box, New York, NY, 10029, https://ccclivecases.org. You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact

suggestion
Suggestions
IVUS Guided PCI of LAD-D1 Bifurcation using Rotational Atherectomy and 2-Stent Mini-crush Technique – March 2021
Views 365

Case & Plan: 47-year-old female with ESRD on HD, presented with CCS Class I angina and a markedly positive SPECT MPI for anterior and lateral wall ischemia. A Cardiac Cath on February 23, 2021 revealed severely calcified 1 V CAD: 90% proximal LAD and diagonal bifurcation (Medina 1,1,1), 80% mid LAD and SYNTAX Score of […]


Complex prox RCA CTO Recanalization via Retrograde Approach – February 2021
Views 412

56-year-old male presented with Class III unstable angina and positive stress MPI for significant inferior ischemia. A Cardiac Cath on November 20, 2020 at outside hospital revealed 2 V VAD: 85% mid LAD, 70% D1 and CTO proximal RCA with distal vessel fills retrogradely via septal collaterals (J-CTO Score 3), LVEF = 50% and Syntax […]


High-Risk Complex PCI of Diffuse Multivessel CAD – January 2021
Views 673

  Case and Plan: 45-year-old male with multiple CAD risk factors presented to OSH on November 6, 2020 with unstable angina and positive ETT. A Cardiac Cath on November 9, 2020 revealed extensive 3V CAD: 100% mid LAD, 90% D2, 70% proximal LCx, 100% LCx-OM1, 100% mid RCA with LVEF = 60% and SYNTAX Score […]


Extremely Tortuous Angulated mid LAD Diagonal Bifurcation Lesion – December 2020
Views 817

Case and Plan: 75-year-old female presented with new onset CCS Class II angina and positive stress MPI on November 9, 2020 revealing moderate apical and inferior ischemia. A Cardiac Cath on November 24, 2020 revealed 2 V CAD: 95% proximal RCA, angulated tortuous 95% mid LAD bifurcation lesion, LVEF = 60% and SYNTAX Score = […]